MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982397785 · doi:10.4324/9781315187457-5

From Earliest Contacts: An Examination of Inuit and Aleut 1 Art 2 in Scottish Collections

2019· book-chapter· en· W2982397785 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Briony Crozier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryGenealogyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines collections of Inuit and Aleut art in Scotland. They include items gathered on explorative journeys by Sir William Parry during the 1820s; collected by Scots during the nineteenth century, and produced for the late twentieth century art market. While Eskimoaleut art objects can be bought quite easily on the European and American market if one knows where to look, numbers of tourists, in the modern sense of the word, to the north polar region itself are small. The earliest identified group of Eskimoaleut &s;souvenirs&s; in Scotland is at the National Museums of Scotland in Edinburgh, and relates to the explorative excursions of William Edward Parry around Melville Peninsula while attempting to discover the northern sea route to the Far East, the Northwest Passage, in 1821-1823. From the eighteenth century to the present, explorers, whalers, traders, scientists, and a small number of late twentieth century museum curators have all brought items of such artwork to Scotland.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0150.022
Science and technology studies0.0160.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207