MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982398536 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2019.8885012

A Pre-Skewed Bi-Directional Gated Delay Line Bang-Bang Frequency Detector with Applications in 10 Gbps Serial Link Frequency-Locking

2019· article· en· W2982398536 on OpenAlexaff
Yue Li, Fei Yuan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFrequency dividerElectronic engineeringAutomatic frequency controlDetectorLock (firearm)Frequency synthesizerPhase frequency detectorPhase detectorCMOSPhase-locked loopPhysicsElectrical engineeringJitterVoltageEngineeringTelecommunicationsCharge pump

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a pre-skewed bi-directional gated delay line (BDGDL) bang-bang frequency detector (BBFD) with applications in frequency-locking of 10 Gbps (giga-bits-persecond) serial links. Bang-bang frequency detection is performed using a pair of BDGDLs that digitize the logic-1 pulse of receiver oscillator and a reference clock. A redundant successive approximation register (SAR) driven by the output of the BBFD is used to generate the frequency control word (FCW) of the digitally controlled oscillator (DCO) of the receiver. A frequency detection decision can be made in only 4 cycles of the reference clock. The frequency error of the ADFLL utilizing the proposed BBFD is analyzed. The ADFLL is designed in a TSMC 65 nm 1.2 V CMOS and tested with a 5 GHz reference clock. Simulation results show the ADFLL achieves frequency lock in less than 10 ns with the maximum frequency error in the lock state is within the frequency error boundaries of the BBFD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207