MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982456281 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2019.8885921

A Novel Travel-Delay Aware Short-Term Vehicular Traffic Flow Prediction Scheme for VANET

2019· article· en· W2982456281 on OpenAlexaff
Yanjie Tao, Peng Sun, Azzedine Boukerche

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVehicular ad hoc networkComputer scienceAutoregressive modelTraffic flow (computer networking)Key (lock)Wireless ad hoc networkTerm (time)Scheme (mathematics)Intelligent transportation systemReal-time computingTravel timeComputer networkTransport engineeringTelecommunicationsComputer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How to achieve a fast and safe data dissemination in the Vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET) is a hot research topic these days. However, the high mobility of the vehicles makes the topology of VANET unstable, and real-time road information is generally limited. Considering these shortcomings, it is helpful to use the accurate traffic prediction to assist the topology control in the VANET. For offering a better traffic flow prediction, this paper proposes an innovative hybrid prediction method, Delay-based Spatial-Temporal Autoregressive Moving Average model (DSTARMA) to enhance prediction effect. This model mainly focuses on dealing with the travel delay problem in short-term traffic flow prediction. In other words, vehicles always need some time to move from one place to another in a real traffic situation, and this period is called travel delay. In previous spatial-temporal models, no one takes this factor into account. In our model, the travel delay is handled in the form of spatial-temporal weighted matrices and treated as a key role. We evaluated our approach based on data in England highway traffic system. The result proves our approach is reliable and has the ability to offer more accurate road information in advance to support VANET.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207