MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982461623 · doi:10.1002/rcm.8644

A sensitive and cost‐effective high‐performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (multiple reaction monitoring) method for the clinical measurement of serum hepcidin

2019· article· en· W2982461623 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Chen, Jun Liu, Bruce Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of VictoriaIsland Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHepcidinChromatographyProtein precipitationChemistryLiquid chromatography–mass spectrometrySelected reaction monitoringReproducibilitySolid phase extractionTandem mass spectrometryMass spectrometryMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: Hepcidin is a peptide hormone that plays a central role in regulating iron metabolism. It is a potential biomarker for the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of iron metabolism disorders. Serum hepcidin level can differ by 3 orders of magnitude depending on the patient's condition. Existing liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) assays lack clinical sensitivity or require costly sample preparation steps. A simple, sensitive, robust and cost-effective assay for serum hepcidin quantitation in routine clinical laboratories is needed. METHODS: A high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) method was developed to quantify hepcidin in human serum using chemically synthesized hepcidin as a standard and stable-isotope-labeled hepcidin as the internal standard. The method was validated according to CLSI-C62A guidelines. Calibrators were prepared with hepcidin-free serum. Clinical samples were separately processed and compared using solid-phase extraction (SPE) and acetonitrile (ACN) protein precipitation. RESULTS: >0.99. Both the SPE and the ACN precipitation methods had excellent and comparable reproducibility. The intra-day and inter-day coefficients of variation (CVs) were <3% and <6%. There was 89% and 88% hepcidin recovery by SPE and ACN preparation. Measurement of secondary reference material using non-traceable calibrators yielded up to 30% positive bias, comparable with values obtained by an external comparator. Hepcidin was stable in serum at ambient temperature and at 4°C. The relative errors (REs) were ≤1.2% and ≤4.4%, respectively. The freeze-thaw (-70°C) stability after 3 cycles showed a relative error (RE) of ≤1.8%. The impact on hepcidin recovery due to hemolysis (4+), lipemia (4+) and Icterus (4+) was <3%. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and validated a simple, sensitive, robust and cost-effective HPLC/MS/MS method for the quantitation of serum hepcidin. The method uses ACN protein precipitation for sample preparation and reversed-phase normal-flow HPLC. Sample preparation is inexpensive; it can be automated with a liquid handling system to allow high-throughput application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRapid Communications in Mass SpectrometrySame topicIron Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207