Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>‐Polyacrylamide Electrolytes and Enabled Solid‐State Electrochemical Capacitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A highly ionic‐conductive and high‐performance neutral pH polymer electrolyte comprises of Na 2 SO 4 and polyacrylamide (PAM) was developed for solid electrochemical double‐layer capacitors (EDLCs). Na 2 SO 4 was compared with Li 2 SO 4 baseline in liquid electrolyte and exhibited higher ionic conductivity and identical stability window. Na 2 SO 4 −PAM electrolytes were optimized by varying their salt‐to‐polymer ratio. While all compositions show excellent stability for over 30‐day tracking period, an ionic conductivity of ca. 30 mS cm −1 was attained at 10,000 : 1 molar ratio of Na 2 SO 4 :PAM, among the highest reported for neutral pH polymer electrolytes. Raman spectroscopy verified that the electrolyte maintained well‐hydrated ions throughout the 30 days monitoring period. Solid EDLCs were constructed using activated carbon electrodes and Na 2 SO 4 −PAM electrolyte. They exhibited a wide 1.9 V operating window at 50 mV s −1 CV scan rate, with comparable capacitance to its liquid baseline. The solid EDLCs outperformed many symmetric devices in terms of energy and power densities. They also displayed good rate capability (up to 500 mV s −1 ) and excellent cycle life (>8,000 cycles).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".