MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982555104 · doi:10.5206/mfds-ecfw.v4i1.8485

La configuration architecturale de l’espace carcéral dans Manon Lescaut de Prévost : les enjeux d’une représentation romanesque

2019· article· fr· W2982555104 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Salwa Ben Taktak

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Monde français du dix-huitième siècle · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les épisodes carcéraux rythment le roman. Manon Lescaut est prisonnière à la Salpêtrière à deux reprises ; Des Grieux à son tour fut enfermé quatre fois. Les espaces d’enfermement émaillent l’espace textuel. Ils se déclinent sur plusieurs formes architecturales ; on distingue le « chariot », la « chambre haute », ainsi que de véritables prisons incluant l’Hôpital, Saint-Lazare, le Petit-Chatelet et l’étroite prison à la Nouvelle Orléans. La matérialité des lieux d’enfermement, ses composantes (« bâtiment haut à trois étages et impénétrable », « les galeries bouchées par des portes épaisses », « la barrière », la « grande porte de la rue ») forment le cadre architectural dont Manon et Des Grieux dépendent. L’architecture est dotée de fonctions dramatiques, qui conditionnent le quotidien des personnages et les péripéties des évasions facilitées par les ruses de Des Grieux. L’architecture de l’espace carcéral met en relief la ferveur de la passion et la prouesse de l’amant, et devient symbolique de l’amour-passion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.012
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe Monde français du dix-huitième siècleSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207