Spur line integrated single‐/dual‐/triple‐notched ultra‐wideband monopole antenna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Design and realization of spur line loaded frequency-notched planar ultra-wideband (UWB) antenna is proposed in this article. Accommodating the spur line (lines) of quarter wavelength long on the feeding microstrip line of UWB antenna, contributes to the notch-filtering action in the feeding section itself which in turn can provides single/double/triple notch (notches) within the UWB spectrum of the antenna. The proposed technique is very simple and radiator independent as the filtering is performed in the feed region and hence the UWB radiator can be independently designed. The spur line based filtering sections are first separately designed and verified by S-parameter measurements of the fabricated prototypes. Single, double, and triple spur line loaded microstrip sections are separately used as the feed section of a circular monopole antenna (MPA) to invoke single-, dual-, and triple-notched UWB response of the MPA. All the designed prototypes are fabricated and characterized in terms of impedance and radiation parameter measurements, yielding very close correspondence with that of results obtained from full wave simulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".