MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982582654

Approche Multi-agent pour l'analyse de journaux

2019· preprint· fr· W2982582654 on OpenAlexaff
Florent Mouysset, Frédéric Migeon, Marie-Pierre Gleizes, Christophe Bortolaso, Mustapha Derras

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (University of Toulouse) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Canadian institutionsBerger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À mesure que les applications se complexifient, l’usage qui en découle dévie de leur conception. Il est alors intéressant de redécouvrir des modèles de ces processus
\nmétier a posteriori, notamment en analysant les journaux d’activité des utilisateurs. Cependant, ces journaux d’activité peuvent contenir des erreurs qui compliquent la
\ndécouverte de modèles fiables et réalistes. Dans cet article, un système multi-agent (SMA) appelé SAMOTRACE est conçu et s’adresse à cette problématique. Sa mise en oeuvre est basée sur des agents autoorganisés. Les expériences montrent que le système tend à converger vers une solution
\noptimale, quels que soient le type et la quantité d’erreurs présentes dans les observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0110.015
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (University of Toulouse)Same topicMulti-Agent Systems and NegotiationFrench-language works237,207