MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982615686 · doi:10.3917/lae.194.0006

L’émergence en France du mouvement des soins palliatifs et de l’accompagnement

2019· article· fr· W2982615686 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick Verspieren

Bibliographic record

VenueLaennec · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans l’invention des soins palliatifs, deux figures ont une place prééminente, le Dr Cicely Saunders, fondatrice en 1967 à Londres de Saint-Christopher’s Hospice, devenu rapidement un pôle de référence mondialement reconnu, et le Dr Balfour Mount qui ouvrit à Montréal en 1975 une petite structure qu’il dénomma « Unité de soins palliatifs ». Parvenus à une vision claire de leur projet, ils le menèrent jusqu’à sa pleine réalisation. Il en alla différemment en France. Il y faudra de nombreuses années, la découverte progressive de l’œuvre de ces deux médecins, l’engagement de bien des acteurs, le dépassement de maintes résistances, pour que soit enfin reconnue officiellement en 1986 cette nouvelle conception du soin et de la relation avec les malades en fin de vie, point de départ vers des structures sanitaires destinées à ces patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaennecSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207