MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982637102 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v11n6p1

Criteria for H-Matrices Based on γ−Diagonally Dominant Matrix

2019· article· en· W2982637102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHujiang Foundation of China
KeywordsDiagonally dominant matrixMathematicsDiagonalMatrix (chemical analysis)Diagonal matrixMain diagonalMatrix splittingPrincipal (computer security)Band matrixBlock matrixOrder (exchange)Square matrixApplied mathematicsCombinatoricsAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsSymmetric matrixGeometryComputer scienceEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a new practical criteria for H-matrix based on γ-diagonally dominant matrix. In order to make the judgment conditions convenient and effective, we give two new definitions, one is called strong and weak diagonally dominant degree, the other is called the sum of non-principal diagonal element for the matrix. Further, we obtain a new practical method for the determination of the H-matrix by combining the properties of γ-diagonally dominant matrix, constructing positive diagonal matrix, and adding the appropriate parameters. Finally, we offer numerical examples to verify the validity of the judgment conditions, corresponding numerical examples compared the new criteria and the existing results are presented to verify the advantages of the new determination method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it