MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982645678 · doi:10.1096/fj.201900417r

The receptor‐receptor interaction between mGluR1 receptor and NMDA receptor: a potential therapeutic target for protection against ischemic stroke

2019· article· en· W2982645678 on OpenAlexaff
Terence K.Y. Lai, Dongxu Zhai, Ping Su, Anlong Jiang, Jay Boychuk, Fang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabotropic glutamate receptor 1ExcitotoxicityNeuroprotectionNMDA receptorMetabotropic glutamate receptor 5NeuroscienceStroke (engine)ReceptorMedicineGlutamate receptorMetabotropic glutamate receptorPharmacologyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ischemic stroke is one of the leading causes of long‐term disability worldwide. It arises when the blood flow to the brain is severely impaired, causing brain infarction. The current therapies for ischemic stroke are tissue plasminogen activator and mechanical thrombectomy, which re‐establishes blood circulation to the brain but offers no neuroprotective effects. Excitotoxicity, particularly through the N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor (NMDAR), has been heavily implicated in the pathophysiology of brain infarction resulting from ischemic stroke. Here we investigated the interaction between NMDAR and metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) as a novel target to develop potential neuroprotective agents for ischemic stroke. Through coimmunoprecipitation and affinity binding assay, we revealed that the interaction is mediated through 2 distinct sites on the mGluR1 C terminus. We then found that the disruption of mGluR1‐GluN2A subunit of NMDAR (GluN2A) protected the primary mouse hippocampal neurons against NMDAR‐mediated excitotoxicity and reversed the NMDAR‐mediated regulation of ERK1/2 in rat hippocampal slices. The same protection was also observed in an animal model of ischemic stroke, alleviating brain infarction and yielding better motor recovery. These findings confirmed the existence of a receptor‐receptor interaction between NMDAR and mGluR1, implicating this interconnection as a potential treatment target site for ischemic stroke.—Lai, T. K. Y., Zhai, D. Su, P., Jiang, A., Boychuk, J., Liu, F. The receptor‐receptor interaction between mGluR1 receptor and NMDA receptor: a potential therapeutic target for protection against ischemic stroke. FASEB J. 33, 14423‐14439 (2019). www.fasebj.org

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207