Perceptions des enseignants et des directions d’école concernant les facteurs qui ont une influence sur le rendement scolaire des élèves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude vise à identifier les perceptions des enseignants et des directions d’école en ce qui concerne les facteurs qui influencent le rendement scolaire des élèves. La cueillette de données a été réalisée par un questionnaire administré à des enseignants et des directions d’école (N = 116) provenant de l’ensemble des écoles primaires francophones du Nouveau-Brunswick. Les résultats montrent que les enseignants attribuent le rendement scolaire autant à des facteurs externes (liés aux élèves) qu’à des facteurs qui leurs sont internes (liés aux enseignants), et que les directions d’école l’attribuent à des facteurs qui leur sont externes (liés aux enseignants). Globalement, les résultats montrent que les directions d’école et les enseignants accordent une grande importance à la qualité de l’enseignement ainsi qu’à la motivation et l’engagement des élèves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".