MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982653731 · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12948-2

Soil net nitrogen mineralisation across global grasslands

2019· article· en· W2982653731 on OpenAlexaff
Anita C. Risch, Stephan Zimmermann, Raúl Ochoa‐Hueso, M. Schütz, Beat Frey, Jennifer Firn, Philip A. Fay, Frank Hagedorn, Elizabeth T. Borer, Eric W. Seabloom, W. Stanley Harpole, Johannes M. H. Knops, Rebecca L. McCulley, Arthur A. D. Broadbent, Carly Stevens, Maria L. Silveira, Peter B. Adler, Selene Báez, Lori Biederman, John M. Blair, Cynthia S. Brown, Maria C. Caldeira, Scott L. Collins, Pedro Daleo, A. di Virgilio, Anne Ebeling, Nico Eisenhauer, Ellen Esch, Anu Eskelinen, Nicole Hagenah, Yann Hautier, Kevin Kirkman, Andrew S. MacDougall, Joslin L. Moore, Sally A. Power, Suzanne M. Prober, Christiane Roscher, Mahesh Sankaran, Julia Siebert, Karina L. Speziale, Pedro M. Tognetti, Risto Virtanen, Laura Yahdjian, Barbara Moser

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersDeutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-LeipzigUniversidad de Buenos AiresNature ConservancyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of MinnesotaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceMineralization (soil science)CyclingNitrogen cycleGrasslandBiomass (ecology)NutrientEcologySoil waterSoil scienceNitrogenChemistryBiologyGeographyForestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Soil nitrogen mineralisation (N min ), the conversion of organic into inorganic N, is important for productivity and nutrient cycling. The balance between mineralisation and immobilisation (net N min ) varies with soil properties and climate. However, because most global-scale assessments of net N min are laboratory-based, its regulation under field-conditions and implications for real-world soil functioning remain uncertain. Here, we explore the drivers of realised (field) and potential (laboratory) soil net N min across 30 grasslands worldwide. We find that realised N min is largely explained by temperature of the wettest quarter, microbial biomass, clay content and bulk density. Potential N min only weakly correlates with realised N min , but contributes to explain realised net N min when combined with soil and climatic variables. We provide novel insights of global realised soil net N min and show that potential soil net N min data available in the literature could be parameterised with soil and climate data to better predict realised N min .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations145
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207