A Tale of Two Markets and the Role of Prosperous Market-Augmenting Governments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the role of market-augmenting government and the two general conditions for achieving economic prosperity. Markets exist ubiquitously, but the markets in rich countries are substantially different from those in poor countries. In rich countries, the markets are the main source of prosperity and thus are called prosperous markets. For a country to achieve rapid economic growth, the country should obtain gains not only from the mutually advantageous trades, but also from the rights-intensive, property rights-intensive or contract rightsintensive productions. The mutually advantageous trades and individual rights-intensive productions take place both in the government-contrived markets and in the rich countries. The countries having a market-augmenting government coined by Olson (2000) tend to grow most rapidly. A market-augmenting government should not only be ¡®strong¡¯ enough to guarantee secure and well-defined property rights and contract enforcement rights to the people, but also be ¡®inhibited¡¯ so as not to deprive or damage individual rights. The two general conditions to achieve economic prosperity are secure and well-defined individual rights, and the absence of any predation. These conditions are realized in countries with market-augmenting governments and rightsrespecting democracies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".