MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982688076 · doi:10.32662/gatj.v2i2.722

Penerapan GMP pada UKM Keripik SEMAT (Sehat dan Nikmat)

2019· article· id· W2982688076 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGorontalo Agriculture Technology Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Keripik Semat Desa Tenjo merupakan Usaha Kecil Menengah (UKM) yang telah memiliki PIRT dengan nomor 2153201010561-22. Meski demikian UKM ini masih memerlukan prosedur-prosedur untuk memenuhi persyaratan-persyaratan kualitas pangan yang baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis masalah keterbatasan UKM dalam memenuhi persyaratan-persyaratan kualitas pangan yang baik. Dalam penelitian ini permasalahan dianalisis dengan metode observasi, FGD, dan wawancara secara mendalam. Acuan GMP yang dirujuk merupakan standar yang dipakai oleh Food Safety Center of Manitoba (2018). Penerapan Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) di UKM Keripik Tenjo telah memenuhi syarat-syarat CPPB-IRT pada level 4 (PIRT). Namun diperlukan kontrol yang lebih baik pada peralatan, peningkatan nilai praktek personal, penerapan prosedur penjagaan kebersihan bahan, kontrol lingkungan, pengontrolan penggorengan, pengemasan, dan storage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it