MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982706461 · doi:10.1109/tap.2019.2948574

Single-Layer Dual-Band Polarization-Selective Metafilm With Independently Controlled and Closely Spaced Shielding Bands

2019· article· en· W2982706461 on OpenAlexafffund
Elham Baladi, Mitchell Semple, Ashwin K. Iyer

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates
KeywordsElectromagnetic shieldingMulti-band devicePhysicsMetamaterialResonatorPolarization (electrochemistry)Radio spectrumTopology (electrical circuits)Materials scienceNuclear magnetic resonanceOpticsComputer scienceElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a highly compact metafilm structure with two closely spaced and independently controlled shielding bands. The constituent unit cell is a composite of two different single-band metafilm unit cells realized by the application of a meandered-loop resonator and a mu-negative and near-zero (MNNZ) metamaterial liner, respectively, to a metallic disc resonator. Both liners introduce frequency-reduced resonances resulting in highly subwavelength unit cells. The composite dual-band unit cell undergoes resonances at sizes of λ0/10 and λ0/8 in two operating bands, where it exhibits a fano-shaped reflection profile. The unit cells are closely packed and constructed on a single metallic layer, resulting in a compact and low-profile metafilm design. Furthermore, due to the use of two separate and noninteracting resonance mechanisms, the operating bands are highly selective, can be spaced very close to each other, and may be controlled independently through the design of the individual meandering and MNNZ elements. We present simulation data, extraction of susceptibility tensors using generalized sheet-transition conditions (GSTCs) as well as experiments confirming a dual-band, polarization-selective shielding response using a compact metafilm structure measuring 1.3λ0× 1.7λ0at the lower band and 1.7λ0× 2.3λ0at the upper frequency band. The proposed design remains nearly transparent at other frequencies and/or for the orthogonal polarization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207