MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982713370 · doi:10.1109/imtc.1999.776987

Wavelet-transform-based method of analysis for Lamb-wave ultrasonic NDE signals

2003· article· en· W2982713370 on OpenAlexaff
S. Legendre, Daniel Massicotte, J. Goyette, T.P. Bose

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic acoustic transducerAcousticsSIGNAL (programming language)Ultrasonic sensorWaveletWavelet transformLamb wavesTransducerUltrasonic testingNondestructive testingComputer scienceSignal processingFeature extractionTime–frequency analysisEngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringComputer visionSurface wavePhysicsTelecommunicationsDigital signal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new acoustic nondestructive testing method which uses Lamb waves as the probe. These waves are generated and received by an electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT). The position of flaws in the structure under test is computed from the time of arrival of main peak of the reflected signal. Due to the noisy nature of the received signal, we use a wavelet transform algorithm to extract the required time information. The main advantage of such a multi-scale method of signal analysis is to be suitable for detection peak problems especially in highly noisy environment. We explain how we proceed to do the feature extraction and proposed two methods for reconstructing the image of the inspected structure. Results of real-world ultrasonic Lamb wave signal analysis are presented, including the case of synthetic and experimental noisy signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207