MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982840510 · doi:10.1002/mop.32147

Pattern reconfigurable Yagi‐Uda antenna with seven switchable beams for WiMAX application

2019· article· en· W2982840510 on OpenAlexaff
Sagiru Gaya, Rifaqat Hussain, Mohammad S. Sharawi, Hussein Attia

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPIN diodeReconfigurable antennaReconfigurabilityDirectivityAntenna (radio)WiMAXGround planeOpticsReflector (photography)Periscope antennaRadiation patternCoaxial antennaMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsDiodeTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, a pattern reconfigurable printed Yagi‐Uda antenna with linear polarization is presented. The proposed design consists of three parts, including a driving element centered between two other parasitic elements. To achieve pattern reconfigurability, the approach of Yagi‐Uda configuration is employed, where the positions of the director and reflector are exchanged using PIN diodes. The proposed antenna employing six PIN diodes is designed to radiate the main beam at seven scanning angles (−60°, −40°, −20°, 0°, 20°, 40°, and 60°). The beam tilt depends on the size of the antenna's partial ground plane. The proposed design is simple in structure realized on a single substrate board of dimensions 75 × 70 mm2. The measured peak directivity obtained at various scanning angles is about 6.5 dB. The simulated and measured results are in good agreement. The proposed reconfigurable antenna is suitable for WiMAX applications operating around the frequency of 3.6 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207