MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982849852 · doi:10.4000/books.msha.844

Transmission du savoir et enjeux linguistiques dans les traités sur la médecine des femmes en France (1530 à 1630)

2017· book-chapter· fr· W2982849852 on OpenAlexaff
Valérie Worth-Stylianou

Bibliographic record

VenueMaison des Sciences de l’Homme d’Aquitaine eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au cours du xvie et du premier xviie siècle, les textes médicaux en langue française qui traitaient de la génération, de la grossesse et de l’accouchement connurent un essor remarquable. Ceci nous amène à nous poser une question : dans quelle mesure, et pourquoi, la langue française remplaça-t-elle le latin dans ce domaine de la médecine ? Et, à l’inverse, dans quelles circonstances le latin résista-t-il néanmoins à la concurrence de la langue vernaculaire, notamment grâce à de nouvelles trad...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaison des Sciences de l’Homme d’Aquitaine eBooksSame topicHistorical Linguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207