External Force Observer for Small- and Medium-Sized Humanoid Robots
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
External force observer for humanoid robots has been widely studied in the literature. However, most of the proposed approaches generally rely on information from six-axis force/torque sensors, which the small or medium-sized humanoid robots usually do not have. As a result, those approaches cannot be applied to this category of humanoid robots, which are widely used nowadays in education or research. In this paper, we propose a Kalman filter-based observer to estimate the three components of an external force applied in any direction and at an arbitrary point of the robot’s structure. The observer is simple to implement and can easily run in real time using the embedded processor of a small or medium-sized humanoid robot such as Nao or Darwin-OP. Moreover, the observer does not require any changes to the robot’s hardware, as it only uses measurements from the available force-sensing resistors (FSR) inserted under the feet of the humanoid robot and from the robot’s inertial measurement unit (IMU). The proposed observer was extensively validated on a Nao humanoid robot in both cases of standing still or walking while an external force was applied to the robot. In the conducted experiments, the observer successfully estimated the external force within a reasonable margin of error. Moreover, the experimental data and the MATLAB and C++/ROS implementations of the proposed observer are available as an open source package. https://goo.gl/VkhejY.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it