MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982892418 · doi:10.1142/s2424905x19420017

Augmented Reality Training Platform for Neurosurgical Burr Hole Localization

2019· article· en· W2982892418 on OpenAlexafffund
Zachary M. C. Baum, András Lassó, Sarah Ryan, Tamás Ungi, Emily Rae, Boris Zevin, Ron Levy, Gábor Fichtinger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Robotics Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersSoutheastern Ontario Academic Medical OrganizationCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsDrillAugmented realityComputer sciencePosition (finance)NeurosurgeryTraining (meteorology)Identification (biology)Plan (archaeology)Medical physicsWork (physics)CurriculumArtificial intelligenceSimulationMedicineSurgeryEngineeringPsychologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Augmented reality (AR) is used in neurosurgery to visualize lesions and plan procedures pre-operatively and intra-operatively, though its use has not been widely adopted in simulation-based neurosurgical training for the same tasks. This work defines metrics to determine performance in drill position and angle identification for neurosurgical training. The metrics were validated intra-operatively and in a simulated training environment, demonstrating that trainees identify drill position and angle faster and more accurately with AR compared with standard techniques. Training using AR and the proposed metrics stands to add value to neurosurgical curricula development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.293
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Robotics ResearchSame topicSurgical Simulation and TrainingFrench-language works237,207