MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2982892418 · doi:10.1142/s2424905x19420017

Augmented Reality Training Platform for Neurosurgical Burr Hole Localization

2019· article· en· W2982892418 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Robotics Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersSoutheastern Ontario Academic Medical OrganizationCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsDrillAugmented realityComputer sciencePosition (finance)NeurosurgeryTraining (meteorology)Identification (biology)Plan (archaeology)Medical physicsWork (physics)CurriculumArtificial intelligenceSimulationMedicineSurgeryEngineeringPsychologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Augmented reality (AR) is used in neurosurgery to visualize lesions and plan procedures pre-operatively and intra-operatively, though its use has not been widely adopted in simulation-based neurosurgical training for the same tasks. This work defines metrics to determine performance in drill position and angle identification for neurosurgical training. The metrics were validated intra-operatively and in a simulated training environment, demonstrating that trainees identify drill position and angle faster and more accurately with AR compared with standard techniques. Training using AR and the proposed metrics stands to add value to neurosurgical curricula development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.293
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it