MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983016362 · doi:10.3390/math7111099

Definite Integral of Arctangent and Polylogarithmic Functions Expressed as a Series

2019· article· en· W2983016362 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Identities
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInverse trigonometric functionsMathematicsConstant (computer programming)LogarithmReciprocalSeries (stratigraphy)Function (biology)Mathematical analysisLogarithmic derivativeImproper integralPure mathematicsIntegral equationFourier integral operatorComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a method using contour integration to evaluate the definite integral of arctangent reciprocal logarithmic integrals in terms of infinite sums. In a similar manner, we evaluate the definite integral involving the polylogarithmic function L i k ( y ) in terms of special functions. In various cases, these generalizations give the value of known mathematical constants such as Catalan’s constant G, Aprey’s constant ζ ( 3 ) , the Glaisher–Kinkelin constant A, l o g ( 2 ) , and π .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it