MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983118500 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2019.2942804

A Supervised Artificial Neural Network-Assisted Modeling of Magnetorheological Elastomers in Tension–Compression Mode

2019· article· en· W2983118500 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkMagnetorheological fluidComputer scienceBackpropagationCompression (physics)PerceptronMultilayer perceptronMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceStructural engineeringComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modeling of highly sophisticated behavior of magnetorheological elastomers (MREs) is an essential step toward optimally designing and effectively controlling the smart material-based devices. While modeling MREs in shear mode has been widely carried out by employing continuum mechanics, mathematical techniques, and phenomenological approaches, the correct determination of dynamic behavior of MREs in tension-compression mode has been addressed in only a few studies due to inherent complexities mainly arising from the computational demandingness of the process. This article addresses the functionality of artificial neural network (ANN) for prediction of MRE's dynamic behavior in tension-compression mode under different levels of strain, frequency, and magnetic flux density. A multilayer perceptron-based feed-forward neural network with backpropagation training technique was used with various structures to identify an optimal configuration. A neural network structure with 20 neurons in the hidden layer was adopted, which revealed the mean square error (MSE) magnitude of 7.1 kPa with R <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> values above 0.97. Afterward, the predicting capacity of the model was evaluated using experimental data sets. The obtained results are suggestive of reasonably acceptable performance of the proposed ANN model, which holds the capacity for a close mapping of the predicted tension-compression stress values to those of experimental ones. Further development of the proposed ANN model serves as a promising approach to deal with the modeling and controlling of engineering devices equipped with tension-compression MREs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it