MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983124040 · doi:10.1177/1751143719887285

Implementation of an experiential learning strategy to reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill adult patients

2019· article· en· W2983124040 on OpenAlexaff
Hernán Michelángelo, Federico Angriman, Rodolfo Pizarro, Susana Bauque, Claudia Kecskes, María Inés Staneloni, David García, Fidencia Espínola, Gustavo Mazer, Cristina Ferrari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Intensive Care Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentilator-associated pneumoniaPneumoniaMechanical ventilationIncidence (geometry)Critically illExperiential learningIntervention (counseling)Emergency medicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicineNursingPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective We evaluated the impact of an experiential learning strategy on both the adherence to the use of bundles and the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill adult patients. Methods Longitudinal, quasi-experimental interrupted time-series study in a tertiary teaching hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Successive measurements were made before and after the intervention was implemented between January 2016 and December 2018. Our main exposure was experiential learning, which was based on a combination of play activities, simulation models, knowledge and attitude competencies, role-playing and feedback. The adherence to the bundle for the care of mechanically ventilated critically-ill adult patients and the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia were the main outcomes of interest. We used generalized linear models including time as a linear spline to estimate the effect of the experiential learning strategy both on the adherence to the bundle of care and the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia during long-term follow-up. Results The overall proportion of adequate bundle use before and after the implementation of the intervention was 60.8% (95% CI: 56.9–64.7) and 85.6% (95% CI: 81.2–90.1), respectively. The incidence rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia before and after the intervention was 6.11 (95% CI: 5.82–6.40) and 3.55 (95% CI: 2.96–4.14) every 1000 days of mechanical ventilation, respectively. The estimated baseline monthly change in the adherence to the mechanical ventilation bundle was 0.4% (95%CI: −0.3–1.2%, p = 0.31) and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.2–2.2%, p < 0.01) before and after the implementation of the intervention, respectively. These results were consistent across our statistical quality control analysis. Conclusions The implementation of experiential learning strategies improves the adherence to bundles in the care of mechanically ventilated critically ill adult patients. Such strategies also decrease the incidence rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Both effects appear to remain constant during long-term follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Intensive Care SocietySame topicSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207