MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983125210 · doi:10.1093/library/10.2.206

<i>Ecclesiastical London</i> . Ed. by M <scp>ary</scp> C. E <scp>rler</scp> . (Records of Early English Drama.) <i>Ecclesiastical London</i> . Ed. by ErlerMary C.. (Records of Early English Drama.) London: The British Library; Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2008. cxxv + 483 pp. £180. <scp>isbn</scp> 978 0 7123 5024 2 (UK); 978 0 8020 9858 0 (Canada).

2009· article· en· W2983125210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. Davison

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Library · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaHistoryMedia studiesLibrary scienceArtSociologyLiteratureComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peter Davison; Ecclesiastical London. Ed. by Mary C. Erler. (Records of Early English Drama.), The Library, Volume 10, Issue 2, 1 June 2009, Pages 206–207, http

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2490.158

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe LibrarySame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207