Intensification of shock damage through heterogeneous phase transition and dislocation loop formation due to presence of pre-existing line defects in single crystal Cu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In general, shock wave deformation studies of perfect single crystals may cause disagreement with the experimental findings as the complete elimination of all defects in the metallic system is not possible in reality. Here, we have studied the influence of edge and screw dislocations on the intensification of damage produced during the propagation of shock at various velocities. Various analyses have been performed such as common neighbor analysis, atomic strain analysis, stress analysis, and kinetic energy mapping to investigate the underlying plastic deformation mechanisms. Results have revealed that the presence of edge dislocations has caused intensified damage through localized amorphization and phase transition. In comparison with the perfect crystal, the presence of pre-existing edge dislocations has incurred an additional damage of ∼17% to the specimen region. On the other hand, the presence of screw dislocations in the specimen causes damage through shear bands and dislocation loop formation, which is found to constitute greater than 80% of the specimen region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".