Evaluation of OM3-PL/FFA Pharmacokinetics After Single and Multiple Oral Doses in Healthy Volunteers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PurposeThe US Food and Drug Administration has approved several omega-3 (OM3)-containing prescription drugs for the treatment of severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG). However, there is still a need to develop formulations with high bioavailability irrespective of the fat content and time of the meal. OM3-phospholipid (PL)/free fatty acid (FFA) is an investigational drug for the treatment of severe HTG containing naturally derived krill oil mixture of OM3, mainly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) as PL esters and as FFA. Both forms in OM3-PL/FFA are believed to be readily bioavailable. Per gram, OM3-PL/FFA contains a lower dose of EPA/DHA in comparison with already approved prescription drugs. The study aim was to evaluate OM3-PL/FFA pharmacokinetic (PK) properties after single and multiple oral doses of 1, 2, and 4 g in healthy subjects when receiving a Therapeutic Lifestyle Change (TLC) diet. The dose proportionality of the study drug, the effect of a high-fat (HF) meal on its PK properties and its safety profile after multiple administration were also explored.MethodsIn this Phase I, open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, single-center, parallel-design study, 42 healthy volunteers following a TLC diet were randomly assigned into 1 of 3 treatment groups in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a single dose at day 1, followed by multiple oral doses of 1, 2, and 4 g/d for 14 days. At day 15, all subjects received a HF breakfast.FindingsAfter once-daily dosing, based on graphic assessment, OM3-PL/FFA levels reached steady state within 7–10 days. Exposure of total EPA + DHA, total DHA, and total EPA (Cmax and AUC) appeared to be approximately proportional over the 1–4 g/d dose range. After 14 days of repeated daily dosing, accumulation was observed and was greater at the higher dose of the study product. When administered after a HF breakfast on day 15, median tmax, the geometric mean of AUC0–24 and Cmax were comparable with the values on day 14 across the 3 dose levels.ImplicationsOM3-PL/FFA was found to be well tolerated in healthy subjects. The study drug PK properties appeared to be approximately dose proportional over the 1–4 g/d dose range. The bioavailability of OM3-PL/FFA did not appear to be meaningfully affected by the fat content of the meal consumed before dose administration. This is clinically relevant because a low-fat diet is part of the management of patients with HTG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".