INCREASED PHYSIOLOGICAL VARIABILITY PREDICTS DECLINING HEALTH AND CRITICAL TRANSITIONS IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Increased variability in levels of several individual biomarkers has been shown to predict adverse outcomes, particularly in hemodialysis patients, for whom time series data is often available. Here, we evaluate the feasibility of using multivariate approaches to quantify global physiological variability as a potential predictor of adverse outcomes. We used data on 588 deaths and 1196 hospitalisations across ~38,000 visits of 591 hemodialysis patients at a Quebec hospital, as well as data on frailty and mortality in 580 patients assessed 20+ times within a one-year period at a hospital in Saitama, Japan. We use two approaches: principal components analysis (PCA) of the coefficients of variation (CVs) of the individual biomarkers over the previous year, and Mahalanobis distance (MD) of the biomarker profile relative to the same profile at the previous time point. We show that both methods provide substantial prediction of both impending mortality and impending hospitalisation, with hazard ratios across the 95% quantile range of the indices varying between 1.5 and 3.5 (p<0.0001). Each unit change on the first PCA axis (PC1) increased frailty odds by 2.34 (95% CI: 1.21-4.52). PCA performed substantially better than MD. CVs of various biomarkers were consistently positively correlated, and PC1 was a good predictor of frailty, mortality, and hospitalisation. Overall, these results confirm that complex physiological integration can break down, resulting in loss of homeostatic control and increasing variability, as predicted by complex systems theory. The resulting indices provide a predictive signal of impending critical health transitions, with both theoretical and clinical implications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".