MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983394854 · doi:10.1002/pro.3774

Prediction of impacts of mutations on protein structure and interactions: SDM, a statistical approach, and mCSM, using machine learning

2019· article· en· W2983394854 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProtein Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilDepartment of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaConselho Nacional das Fundações Estaduais de Amparo à PesquisaResearch Councils UKMedical Research Council CanadaWellcome TrustBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsMissense mutationComputational biologyBiologyMutationGeneticsGeneProtein sequencingMutantBioinformaticsMachine learningComputer sciencePeptide sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Next-generation sequencing methods have not only allowed an understanding of genome sequence variation during the evolution of organisms but have also provided invaluable information about genetic variants in inherited disease and the emergence of resistance to drugs in cancers and infectious disease. A challenge is to distinguish mutations that are drivers of disease or drug resistance, from passengers that are neutral or even selectively advantageous to the organism. This requires an understanding of impacts of missense mutations in gene expression and regulation, and on the disruption of protein function by modulating protein stability or disturbing interactions with proteins, nucleic acids, small molecule ligands, and other biological molecules. Experimental approaches to understanding differences between wild-type and mutant proteins are most accurate but are also time-consuming and costly. Computational tools used to predict the impacts of mutations can provide useful information more quickly. Here, we focus on two widely used structure-based approaches, originally developed in the Blundell lab: site-directed mutator (SDM), a statistical approach to analyze amino acid substitutions, and mutation cutoff scanning matrix (mCSM), which uses graph-based signatures to represent the wild-type structural environment and machine learning to predict the effect of mutations on protein stability. Here, we describe DUET that uses machine learning to combine the two approaches. We discuss briefly the development of mCSM for understanding the impacts of mutations on interfaces with other proteins, nucleic acids, and ligands, and we exemplify the wide application of these approaches to understand human genetic disorders and drug resistance mutations relevant to cancer and mycobacterial infections. STATEMENT FOR A BROADER AUDIENCE: Genetic or somatic changes in genes can lead to mutations in human proteins, which give rise to genetic disorders or cancer, or to genes of pathogens leading to drug resistance. Computer software described here, using statistical approaches or machine learning, uses the information from genome sequencing of humans and pathogens, together with experimental or modeled 3D structures of gene products, the proteins, to predict impacts of mutations in genetic disease, cancer and drug resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it