Incremental Subclass Support Vector Machine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a very competitive linear classifier based on convex optimization problem, were support vectors fully describe decision boundary. Hence, SVM is sensitive to data spread and does not take into account the existence of class subclasses, nor minimizes data dispersion for classification performance improvement. Thus, Kernel subclass SVM (KSSVM) was proposed to handle multimodal data and to minimize data dispersion. Nevertheless, KSSVM has difficulties in classifying sequentially obtained data and handling large scale datasets, since it is based on batch learning. For this reason, we propose a novel incremental KSSVM (iKSSVM) which handles dynamic and large data in a proper manner. The iKSSVM is still based on convex optimization problem and minimizes data dispersion within and between data subclasses incrementally, in order to improve discriminative power and classification performance. An extensive comparative evaluation of the iKSSVM to batch KSSVM, as well as, other contemporary incremental classifiers, on real world datasets, has shown clearly its superiority in terms of classification accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it