MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983559115 · doi:10.5038/2074-1235.47.2.1321

Longevity in the Rhinoceros Auklet Cerorhinca monocerata and a comparison with other species of Alcidae

2019· article· en· W2983559115 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. Mark Hipfner, Daniel Shervill, Alice D. Domalik, Douglas F. Bertram, M. Lemon, Marie R. Rodway, Colin Smith, Sarah Hudson

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine ornithology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeabirdOrnithologyRhinocerosLongevityBiologyZoologyEcologyGeographySouthern HemisphereGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Rhinoceros Auklet Cerorhinca monocerata is an abundant and widely distributed North Pacific seabird.We describe noteworthy longevity records derived from banding operations (1984-1985 and 2008-2018) on several large breeding colonies in British Columbia, Canada.Of note was an individual banded as a nestling on the Lucy Islands in 1985 and recaptured as a breeding adult in 2016, 31 years later.Several other individuals banded in the mid 1980s survived into at least their late 20s.These longevity records for the Rhinoceros Auklet are close to the value predicted by the linear relationship between longevity and log body mass for the 15 species of Alcidae for which data are available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine ornithologySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207