Techno-Economic Analysis of a Microgrid Hybrid Renewable Energy System in Jordan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microgrid is a practical way to integrate conventional and renewable energy sources in small premises.This paper mainly performs a techno-economic analysis of microgrid deployment in Jordan, and analyzes the performance and economic impact of hybrid renewable energy systems for a selected household within the University of Jordan region.Different scenarios were constructed based on the maximum, minimum and average of solar radiation and wind speed data in 2007~2016.In addition, three hybrid renewable energy systems were investigated for the microgrid to the household, namely, (1) photovoltaic generator, wind turbine, diesel generator and battery bank, (2) photovoltaic generator, wind turbine and battery bank, and (3) diesel generator.The comparison shows that the lowest net present cost ($33,547) and lowest electricity cost ($0.237/kWh)were observed in the first hybrid renewable energy system in the scenario of the maximum solar radiation and wind speed.Therefore, the optimal configuration of the hybrid renewable energy system for the microgrid includes: a 1.3kW photovoltaic generator, a 9kW wind turbine, a 1.6kW diesel generator, and a bank of 6 batteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".