Software-Defined Cooperative Data Sharing in Edge Computing Assisted 5G-VANET
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is widely recognized that connected vehicles have the potential to further improve the road safety, transportation intelligence and enhance the in-vehicle entertainment. By leveraging the 5G enabled Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANET) technology, which is referred to as 5G-VANET, a flexible software-defined communication can be achieved with ultra-high reliability, low latency, and high capacity. Many enabling applications in 5G-VANET rely on sharing mobile data among vehicles, which is still a challenging issue due to the extremely large data volume and the prohibitive cost of transmitting such data using 5G cellular networks. This article focuses on efficient cooperative data sharing in edge computing assisted 5G-VANET. First, to enable efficient cooperation between cellular communication and Dedicated Short-Range Communication (DSRC), we first propose a software-defined cooperative data sharing architecture in 5G-VANET. The cellular link allows the communications between OpenFlow enabled vehicles and the Controller to collect contextual information, while the DSRC serves as the data plane, enabling cooperative data sharing among adjacent vehicles. Second, we propose a graph theory based algorithm to efficiently solve the data sharing problem, which is formulated as a maximum weighted independent set problem on the constructed conflict graph. Specifically, considering the continuous data sharing, we propose a balanced greedy algorithm, which can make the content distribution more balanced. Furthermore, due to the fixed amount of computing resources allocated to this software-defined cooperative data sharing service, we propose an integer linear programming based decomposition algorithm to make full use of the computing resources. Extensive simulations in NS3 and SUMO demonstrate the superiority and scalability of the proposed software-defined architecture and cooperative data sharing algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".