MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983808367 · doi:10.3749/canmin.ab00025

The distribution and enrichment of scandium in garnets from the TØrdal pegmatites, south Norway, and its economic implications

2019· article· en· W2983808367 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Georg Steffenssen, Axel Müller, Nanna Rosing-Schow, Henrik Friis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural historyScandiumHistoryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| September 30, 2019 The distribution and enrichment of scandium in garnets from the TØrdal pegmatites, south Norway, and its economic implications Georg Steffenssen; Georg Steffenssen § Colletts gate 49B, 0456 Oslo, Norway § Corresponding author e-mail address: georg.steffenssen@gmail.com Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Axel Müller; Axel Müller Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, NorwayNatural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Nanna Rosing-Schow; Nanna Rosing-Schow Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Henrik Friis Henrik Friis Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Georg Steffenssen § Colletts gate 49B, 0456 Oslo, Norway Axel Müller Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, NorwayNatural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Nanna Rosing-Schow Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway Henrik Friis Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway § Corresponding author e-mail address: georg.steffenssen@gmail.com Publisher: Mineralogical Association of Canada First Online: 07 Oct 2019 Online Issn: 1499-1276 Print Issn: 0008-4476 © 2019 Mineralogical Association of Canada The Canadian Mineralogist (2019) 57 (5): 799–801. https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.AB00025 Article history First Online: 07 Oct 2019 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Georg Steffenssen, Axel Müller, Nanna Rosing-Schow, Henrik Friis; The distribution and enrichment of scandium in garnets from the TØrdal pegmatites, south Norway, and its economic implications. The Canadian Mineralogist 2019;; 57 (5): 799–801. doi: https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.AB00025 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyThe Canadian Mineralogist Search Advanced Search The Sveconorwegian (Grenvillian) Tørdal pegmatite field, located in the county of Telemark in southern Norway, is known for its enrichment in scandium (Sc) as well as other rare metals (e.g., Raade & Kristiansen 2000, 2003). During the last decade, the interest for Sc has increased, due to demands of the automotive, air- and spacecraft industries. The Sc demand has motivated this study which aims to better understand the origin and the processes which have led to Sc enrichment in the Tørdal pegmatites. Garnet, which is a common accessory mineral in the Tørdal pegmatites, preferentially incorporates Sc... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207