MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983908431 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2019.2953165

Quasi-Optimization of Distance and Blocklength in URLLC Aided Multi-Hop UAV Relay Links

2019· article· en· W2983908431 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork packetRelayOptimization problemDecoding methodsWirelessLow latency (capital markets)Reliability (semiconductor)Bit error rateAlgorithmMathematical optimizationComputer networkTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Achieving ultra-high reliability for short packets is a core challenge for future wireless communication systems, as current systems are designed only to transmit long packets based on classical information-theoretic principles. To tackle this challenge, this letter relies on multi-hop unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) relay links to deliver short ultra-reliable and low-latency (URLLC) instruction packets between ground Internet of Things (IoT) devices. To accomplish this task, we perform non-linear optimization to minimize the overall decoding error probability in order to find the optimal values of the distance and the blocklength. In this vein, a novel, semi-empirical based non-iterative algorithm is proposed to solve the quasi-optimization problem. The algorithm executes in quasilinear time and converges to a globally optimal/sub-optimal solution based on the chosen parameters. Simulation results demonstrate that our algorithm allows operation under the ultra-reliable regime (URR), and yields the same performance as exhaustive search algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it