MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983992160 · doi:10.1016/0967-0653(95)96405-t

10.1016/0967-0653(95)96405-t

2000· article· en· W2983992160 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Per S. Anderson, G. J. Wasserburg, J. H. Chen, D. A. Papanastassiou, Johan Ingri

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRadioactive contamination and transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrackish waterSalinityEstuaryEnvironmental scienceDischargeSeawaterHydrology (agriculture)OceanographyBaltic seaSurface waterGeologyDrainage basinGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concentration (C) of dissolved ^(238)U,^(234)U,^(232)Th and230Th in fresh and brackish waters from the Baltic Sea were determined using TIMS. The brackish waters range in salinity from that of sea water (SW) to 2.5‰. C_(238U) in oxygen-saturated, surface waters is well correlated with salinity and shows quasi-conservative behavior, as does Sr. Samples from the redox water interface show depletion in C_(238U), demonstrating that dissolved U is being removed by FeMn oxyhydroxides. From a simple mixing relationship for the brackish water,δ^(234)U^* = 1000‰ was calculated for the fresh water source in the northern Baltic. A study of the Kalixalven River over an annual cycle yields high δ^(234)U during spring and summer discharge and lower values during fall and winter, showing that different sources contribute to the U load in the river during different seasons. C_(232Th) and C_(230Th) in river water are governed by the discharge, reflecting the importance of the increased abundance of small particles ( < 0.45 μm) for the ^(232)Th-^(230)Th load at high discharge. ^(232)Th/^(238)U in river water is about 40 times less than in detrital material. In the brackish water, C_(232Th) drops 2 orders of magnitude in the low salinity region ( < 5‰), reaching a value close to that of sea water at a salinity of 7.5‰. Almost all of the riverine ^(232)Th must be deposited in the low-salinity regions of the estuary. The ^(230)Th/^(232)Th in river waters is about twice the equilibrium value for ^(232)Th/^(238)U (3.8). In the brackish waters, ^(230)Th/^(232)Th is greater by a factor of 10–100 than both river water and SW. The big increase in ^(230)Th/^(232)Th in the Baltic Sea waters over the riverine input indicates that the Th isotopes enter the estuary as a mixture of two carrier phases. We infer that about 96% of ^(232)Th in river water is carried by detrital particles, whereas the other phase (solution, colloidal) has a much higher ^(232)Th/^(232)Th. Entering the estuary, the detrital particles sediment out rapidly, whereas the non-detrital phase is removed more slowly, causing a marked increase in ^(230)Th/^(232)Th in the brackish water. In SW, ^(230)Th/^(232)Th is closer to river input and detrital material than in brackish water. We conclude that in the deep sea, ^(232)Th is almost exclusively dominated by windblown dust and can be used to monitor dust flux. The ^(230)Th excess in Baltic rivers is produced in U-rich, ^(232)Th-poor peatlands and trapped in authigenic particles and transported with the particles. Time scales for producing the ^(230)Th excess are ∼ 2000–8000 yr. This is younger than, but comparable to, the time of the latest deglaciation, which ended some 9000 yr ago when the mires were forming. These results have implications for the possible mobility of actinides stored in repositories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)1.0000.999

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicRadioactive contamination and transferFrench-language works237,207