MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984061808 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.190197

A Case of Minimal Change Disease in a Patient with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Certolizumab

2019· letter· en· W2984061808 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Steven R. Hwang, Adam P. Sawatsky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrticaria and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRheumatoid arthritisDiscontinuationPrednisoneInternal medicinePeripheral edemaArthritisInfliximabWeight lossSurgeryGastroenterologyTumor necrosis factor alphaAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manifestations of renal disease have been reported to develop after tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibition, and they should be considered as a possible complication as TNF-α inhibitors become more prevalent in the treatment of autoimmune inflammatory diseases. We report a case of minimal change disease (MCD) that developed in a woman receiving the TNF-α inhibitor certolizumab and was resolved with high-dose steroids and discontinuation of TNF-α blockade. Ethics approval was waived by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board; the patient’s written informed consent was obtained. A 49-year-old woman with a background history of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Sjögren syndrome presented with a 1-week history of foamy urine, peripheral edema, and 15-kg weight gain. For her RA, she was taking prednisone 5 mg daily and certolizumab 400 mg monthly; the latter had been started 6 months prior to presentation. Physical examination findings demonstrated 2+ pitting edema to the knees … Address correspondence to Dr. S.R. Hwang, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55902, USA. E-mail: hwang.steven{at}mayo.edu

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicUrticaria and Related ConditionsFrench-language works237,207