MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984072958 · doi:10.7205/milmed.169.10.807

Orthopedic Injuries during Operation Enduring Freedom

2004· article· en· W2984072958 on OpenAlex
David L. Lin, Kevin L. Kirk, Kevin P. Murphy, Kathleen A. McHale, William C. Doukas

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMilitary Medicine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthopedic surgeryMedicineMilitary medicineAmputationInjury preventionTrauma centerPoison controlSurgeryIntervention (counseling)Military personnelRetrospective cohort studyMedical emergencyMedical evacuationEmergency medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orthopedic injuries comprise a majority of combat injuries seen in recent U.S. military conflicts. Interventions in the forward deployed area have played an important role in improving mortality rates of soldiers as well as outcome at a medical center level. A retrospective review was conducted on orthopedic injuries from Operation Enduring Freedom evaluated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC). Patients were grouped into one of five injury categories (open fracture, amputation, arterial injuries, neurological injuries, and soft tissue injury) with evacuation time (days from time of injury to arrival at WRAMC) and procedures performed before arrival at WRAMC evaluated. The average evacuation time for all orthopedic casualties was 7.9 days. There was an average of 2.6 procedures performed per patient before arrival at WRAMC. There was no difference in evacuation time among the injury groups. Those with only soft tissue injuries underwent fewer procedures than the other injury groups; however, there was no difference among the injury groups in terms of procedures performed. The number of procedures performed did not affect the evacuation time. Fifty-six percent of casualties required operative intervention after arrival at WRAMC. With the unavoidable evacuation time that all casualties must endure regardless of severity of the injury, early operative intervention in forward deployed medical assets, such as the forward surgical team and combat support hospital, remains a necessity for rehabilitative and reconstructive efforts of the soldiers at the medical center level. This study prospectively validated the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) in patients presenting with acute ankle trauma to a deployed military clinic at Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia. The treating physician determined whether the patient met OAR criteria. The decision to obtain radiographs was left to the discretion of the physician. All radiographs were read by a radiologist blinded to the study. Patients who were not evaluated by radiographs received follow-up in the orthopedic clinic or by telephone. Forty-five consecutive patients were enrolled over a 3-month period. Twenty-nine (64%) patients met the OAR criteria, 32 (71%) received radiographs, and 5 (11%) fractures were identified. All fractures were predicted by the OAR. The sensitivity of the OAR was 1.0 and specificity was 0.40. Negative predictive value was 1.0, positive predictive value was 0.17, likelihood ratio positive value was 1.67, and likelihood ratio negative value was 0.0. The OAR correctly predicted all ankle fractures in the military population studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it