MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984115481 · doi:10.36740/wlek201906102

THE RISK FACTORS OF DYSMENORRHEA IN YOUNG WOMEN

2019· article· en· W2984115481 on OpenAlexaff
Donata Saulė Vilšinskaitė, Greta Vaidokaitė, Žygimantas Mačys, Žana Bumbulienė

Bibliographic record

VenueWiadomości Lekarskie · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityCape Breton Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenarcheMedicineMenstrual cycleObstetricsBody mass indexMenstruationParity (physics)Menstrual bleedingGynecologyDemographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The Aim: To evaluate risk factors for dysmenorrhea in women of reproductive age and to review its characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Material and Methods: A questionnaire was conducted among 354 women followed by a statistical analysis of the gathered data. RESULTS: Results: Among the interviewed women 84.2 % suffer from painful menstruations. Women under 25 years of age are more likely to experience pain, which reduces with age. Dysmenorrhea is more common among women whose menstrual cycles are irregular (92.5%) with a number of bleeding days 4-7 (90.7 %), though still occurring within the normal 21-35 days interval (87.6 %). Nulliparous women are more likely to experience menstrual pain (89.9 %). CONCLUSION: Conclusion: Dysmenorrhea depends on women's age, length of menstrual bleeding, length of menstrual cycle and its regularity, age at menarche and parity, but does not depend on body mass index and smoking status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWiadomości LekarskieSame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207