Seq2Emo for Multi-label Emotion Classification Based on Latent Variable Chains Transformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emotion detection in text is an important task in NLP and is essential in many applications. Most of the existing methods treat this task as a problem of single-label multi-class text classification. To predict multiple emotions for one instance, most of the existing works regard it as a general Multi-label Classification (MLC) problem, where they usually either apply a manually determined threshold on the last output layer of their neural network models or train multiple binary classifiers and make predictions in the fashion of one-vs-all. However, compared to labels in the general MLC datasets, the number of emotion categories are much fewer (less than 10). Additionally, emotions tend to have more correlations with each other. For example, the human usually does not express "joy" and "anger" at the same time, but it is very likely to have "joy" and "love" expressed together. Given this intuition, in this paper, we propose a Latent Variable Chain (LVC) transformation and a tailored model -- Seq2Emo model that not only naturally predicts multiple emotion labels but also takes into consideration their correlations. We perform the experiments on the existing multi-label emotion datasets as well as on our newly collected datasets. The results show that our model compares favorably with existing state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".