MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984292213 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-127148

BIM Regulation Is BTK Dependent and Can be Targeted By Entospletinib in Ibrutinib Refractory Mutants

2019· article· en· W2984292213 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Beckmann, Valeska Berg, Clarissa Dickhut, Günter Krause, René P. Zahedi, Michael Hallek, Lukas P. Frenzel

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIbrutinibBruton's tyrosine kinaseIGHV@Phosphorylationbreakpoint cluster regionCancer researchChronic lymphocytic leukemiaBiologyLeukemiaSignal transductionCell biologyImmunologyTyrosine kinaseReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ibrutinib is especially effective in CLL patients with unmutated IgHV (UM-CLL), although presence of unmutated IgHV is usually associated with poor clinical outcome and shorter PFS. Sustained BCR signaling is one major reason for this. The BCL2 protein BIM plays a pivotal role in regulating apoptosis and high expression of BIM has been associated with presence of unmutated IgHV. This led us to investigate if there is a causality between BIM regulation and ibrutinib sensitivity. Methods: We used quantitative mass spectometry (MS) to analyze the (phospho) proteome of CLL patients with unmutated and mutated IgHV (n=3 respectively) upon BCR stimulation and ibrutinib treatment. BTKC481S overexpressing cells were used to validate our findings from MS. Results: Among all identified (phospho)peptides we found a striking phosphorylation pattern of BIM when comparing UM-CLL and M-CLL. Interestingly, we found that only phosphorylation of S77 was significantly altered, but not phosphorylation of S69 as previously reported. Phosphorylation of BIM S77 was upregulated upon BCR stimulation only in UM-CLL, but not in M-CLL. It is known, that BIM phosphorylation of both S69 and S77 leads to degradation of the protein by ubiquitination. In line with this and with the increase in BIM phosphorylation, total level of BIM decreased upon BCR stimulation. Furthermore we identified BIM as a target of ibrutinib. The BTK inhibitor was able to reduce phosporylation of BIM S77 both in UM-CLL and M-CLL. In accord with the observations of decreased BIM expression upon BCR stimulation, the decrease in phosphorylation of BIM induced by ibrutinib led to higher total levels of BIM. In order to investigate if phosphorylation of BIM is BTK dependent we generated an ibrutinib-resistant BTK mutant (C481S) that was overexpressed in Ramos cells. While ibrutinib treatment led to a decrease of phosphorylation of BIM S77 in wildtype cells, no change in phosphorylation could be observed in cells expressing the BTKC481S mutant, which suggests that BIM regulation by ibrutinib is indeed BTK dependent. Similar to ibrutinib, SYK inhibitor entospletinib leads to reduction of BIM phoshorylation in wildtype Ramos. But in contrast to ibrutinib, both BTK and BIM phosphorlyation were also reduced upon entospletinib treatment in Ramos cells expressing the BTKC481S mutant, which indicates that entospletinib can overcome ibrutinib resistance caused by BTKC481S mutation. Conclusion: For the first time we found that BIM S77 is a target of ibrutinib. Whereas BCR stimulation led to a differential response dependent on IgHV, ibrutinib was able to target BIM both in UM-CLL and M-CLL in a BTK dependent manner. Furthermore, ibrutinib can regulate total BIM levels by preventing protein degradation. Interestingly, the SYK inhibitor entospletinib can also target BIM, but is able to overcome ibrutinib resistance mediated by BTKC481S mutation. Disclosures Hallek: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Mundipharma, Janssen, Celgene, Pharmacyclics, AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Frenzel:Gilead: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207