MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984644129 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30421-8

The shift of obesity burden by socioeconomic status between 1998 and 2017 in Latin America and the Caribbean: a cross-sectional series study

2019· article· en· W2984644129 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Safia S Jiwani, Rodrigo M. Carrillo‐Larco, Akram Hernández‐Vásquez, Tonatiuh Barrientos‐Gutiérrez, Ana Basto‐Abreu, Laura Gutiérrez, Vilma Irazola, Ramfis Nieto‐Martínez, Bruno Pereira Nunes, Diana C. Parra, J. Jaime Miranda

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInter-American Institute for Global Change ResearchNational Cancer InstituteBiomedical Research CouncilFogarty International CenterInternational Development Research CentreNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico y de Innovación TecnológicaWellcome TrustComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaMedical Research CouncilWorld Diabetes FoundationInstituto Colombiano de Bienestar FamiliarBritish CouncilSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science FoundationGrand Challenges CanadaVirginia Marine Resources CommissionDepartment for International Development, UK GovernmentBloomberg PhilanthropiesHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthAlliance for Health Policy and Systems ResearchFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoHarvard University
KeywordsLatin AmericansSocioeconomic statusCross-sectional studyObesityCaribbean regionEnvironmental healthGeographyMedicineGerontologyDemographyPolitical sciencePopulationSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The burden of obesity differs by socioeconomic status. We aimed to characterise the prevalence of obesity among adult men and women in Latin America and the Caribbean by socioeconomic measures and the shifting obesity burden over time. METHODS: We did a cross-sectional series analysis of obesity prevalence by socioeconomic status by use of national health surveys done between 1998 and 2017 in 13 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. We generated equiplots to display inequalities in, the primary outcome, obesity by wealth, education, and residence area. We measured obesity gaps as the difference in percentage points between the highest and lowest obesity prevalence within each socioeconomic measure, and described trends as well as changing patterns of the obesity burden over time. FINDINGS: 479 809 adult men and women were included in the analysis. Obesity prevalence across countries has increased over time, with distinct patterns emerging by wealth and education indices. In the most recent available surveys, obesity was most prevalent among women in Mexico in 2016, and the least prevalent among women in Haiti in 2016. The largest gap between the highest and lowest obesity estimates by wealth was observed in Honduras among women (21·6 percentage point gap), and in Peru among men (22·4 percentage point gap), compared with a 3·7 percentage point gap among women in Brazil and 3·3 percentage points among men in Argentina. Urban residents consistently had a larger burden than their rural counterparts in most countries, with obesity gaps ranging from 0·1 percentage points among women in Paraguay to 15·8 percentage points among men in Peru. The trend analysis done in five countries suggests a shifting of the obesity burden across socioeconomic groups and different patterns by gender. Obesity gaps by education in Mexico have reduced over time among women, but increased among men, whereas the gap has increased among women but remains relatively constant among men in Argentina. INTERPRETATION: The increase in obesity prevalence in the Latin American and Caribbean region has been paralleled with an unequal distribution and a shifting burden across socioeconomic groups. Anticipation of the establishment of obesity among low socioeconomic groups could provide opportunities for societal gains in primordial prevention. FUNDING: None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations140
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207