MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984848303 · doi:10.1155/2019/7875305

New Stabilization Results for Semi‐Markov Chaotic Systems with Fuzzy Sampled‐Data Control

2019· article· en· W2984848303 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Wu, Jinde Cao, Lianglin Xiong, Haiyang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueComplexity · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChaoticControl theory (sociology)Markov chainFuzzy logicStability (learning theory)MathematicsComputer scienceComponent (thermodynamics)Control (management)Applied mathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the problem of stabilization for semi‐Markov chaotic systems with fuzzy sampled‐data controllers, in which the semi‐Markov jump has generally uncertain transition rates. The exponential stability condition is firstly obtained by the following two main techniques: To make full use of the information about the actual sampling pattern, a novel augmented input‐delay‐dependent Lyapunov–Krasovskii functional (LKF) is firstly introduced. Meanwhile, a new zero‐value equation is established to increase the combinations of component vectors of the resulting vector. The corresponding fuzzy sampled‐data controllers are designed based on the stability condition. Finally, the validity and merits of the developed theories are shown by two numerical examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComplexitySame topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207