Real-Time FPGA-Based Hardware Neural Network for Fault Detection and Isolation in More Electric Aircraft
Bibliographic record
Abstract
More Electric Aircraft (MEA) has a great development prospect in the aviation industry thanks to the progressive power electronics technology and digital systems. Nevertheless, any fault occurring in the power electric system of MEA could be a fatal risk for the safety of the aircraft. To deal with the real-time fault detection and isolation (FDI) on the MEA, we put forward an FPGA-based neural network method which includes two stages: off-line construction using TensorFlow and real-time monitoring on the FPGA. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network is applied because of its capability of learning from the long-term historical information in time series. A comprehensive MEA model based on the Boeing 787 power system created in PSCAD/EMTDC <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">®</sup> and a commercial electric aircraft model based on Airbus E-Fan in Simscape are simulated to validate the effectiveness and generality of our proposed method. Adequate contrast experiments are conducted to acquire the most applicable architecture and configurations of the network. The results illustrate that the evaluation of the real-time condition can achieve accuracy over 99.5% within one sampling time on FPGA and reasonable hardware resource utilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".