MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984932593 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2019.2953722

Topology Verification Enabled Intrusion Detection for In-Vehicle CAN-FD Networks

2019· article· en· W2984932593 on OpenAlexaff
Tianqi Yu, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSubnetIntrusion detection systemComputer networkTopology (electrical circuits)Network topologyController (irrigation)Distributed computingComputer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Controller area network with flexible data rate (CAN-FD) is a widely used communication protocol for in-vehicle sensing and control. However, due to the lack of inherent security mechanisms, unauthorized devices could access the CAN-FD by embedding external intruding devices (XIDs) to in-vehicle networks. Malicious intrusion into CAN-FD can expose a compromised vehicle to significantly increased safety, security, and privacy related risks. To enhance the security of CAN-FD networks, a novel intrusion detection method based on verification of network topology is proposed, where XIDs can be reliably detected through a simple random walk based network topology construction and subsequent verification. When an intrusion is detected, a secure mode would be triggered to further protect the network from being attacked. Simulation results indicate that multiple XIDs can be accurately detected, while the increment in the number of XIDs from 1 to 8 can lead to the convergence time increasing from 48 to 102 steps in the powertrain subnet and from 189 to 416 steps in the body subnet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207