MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984988196 · doi:10.1109/tac.2019.2953452

Auditor Product and Controller Synthesis for Nondeterministic Transition Systems With Practical LTL Specifications

2019· article· en· W2984988196 on OpenAlexafffund
M. H. Zibaeenejad, Jun Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFormal Methods in Verification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsNondeterministic algorithmTransition systemComputer scienceProduct (mathematics)Controller (irrigation)Programming languageAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Controller design for continuous systems with linear temporal logic (LTL) specifications is a computationally intensive task. Abstracting a discrete transition system from a real-world continuous-state system often results in a state machine with a large number of states and nondeterministic transitions. This makes controller synthesis for LTL specifications difficult specially when the design specification is lengthy. To reduce the complexity, we consider the specifications that are in the conjunctive form of practical LTL patterns. We use auditor product to incrementally restrict the system to satisfy the safety part of each subspecification. The control strategy, that satisfies the liveness part is then calculated by solving a generalized Buchi game on the result of the auditor product of the discrete transition system with all subspecifications. This approach has the same worst case computational complexity as GR(1) synthesis, but avoids some of the fundamental limitations involved with Assumption → Guarantee formulation of the problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicFormal Methods in VerificationFrench-language works237,207