MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985195631

Ecological NMPC Controller for Connected and Automated Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles at Roundabouts.

2019· article· en· W2985195631 on OpenAlexaff
Sina Alighanbari, Nasser L. Azad

Bibliographic record

VenueIV · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomationPlug-inController (irrigation)Fuel efficiencyAutomotive engineeringTraffic flow (computer networking)Computer scienceEngineeringTransport engineeringControl engineeringComputer security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connectivity and automation provide a spectacular opportunity to improve traffic flow, safety, and efficiency due to their capability to exchange critical driving data and information. On the other hand, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) have been a topic of extensive research in the past and it was demonstrated that it is a good solution for improving fuel economy and ecological features and their performance enhances with the addition of connectivity and automation. Coordination of vehicles at an urban area like roundabouts is a demanding problem especially by knowing that chance of both lateral and longitudinal collision exists. This paper proposes an approach for solving nonlinear multi-objective optimal control problem of decentralized coordination of connected and automated PHEVs (CA-PHEVs) at roundabouts with consideration of fuel economy. It was found that the proposed controller can calculate priority based on a navigation function and provide a safe gap between vehicles. Also, addition of energy cost to the performance index can improve the fuel consumption of the vehicle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIVSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207