MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985242329 · doi:10.17816/kmj2020-165

The effectiveness of the method of external counterpulsation in patients with chronic stable angina

2020· article· en· W2985242329 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rovshan Alakbarov

Bibliographic record

VenueKazan medical journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEjection fractionCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyAnginaInternal medicineCardiologyVentricleStable anginaStatistical significanceHeart failureCoronary heart diseaseMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim. To assess the effectiveness of the complex treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris using the method of external counterpulsation (ECP).
 Methods. 92 patients with chronic stable angina were included in the comparative analysis, which divided into 2 groups: 57 patients received one course of treatment using the ECP method (main group), 35 patients received only drug treatment (control group). Before and after the therapy, a general clinical examination (including determining the functional class of angina pectoris and the need to use nitroglycerin preparations), coronary angiography, echocardiography, exercise stress test (stress ECG), and quality assessment using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) was performed.
 Results. The decrease in the average functional class of angina was more significant in the main group compare to the control group from 2.280.73 to 0.930.80 (p 0.05) versus from 2.340.73 to 1.830.71 (p 0.05). A decrease of at least 1 functional class more often occurred in the main group 78.9% of patients versus 57.1% (p=0.0258). The use of nitroglycerin sharply decreased after treatment in the group, that use the ECP method (by 51.6%; p=0.002), whereas in the control group, despite a slight decrease (by 22.7%), the changes did not reach statistical significance (p=0.0736). Both groups showed similar dynamics of changes in echocardiography. The differences were obtained only for the dynamics of the ejection fraction of the left ventricle (LVEF), which was greater in the main group an increase of 4.695.56% versus 1.755.15% (p=0.0448). The dynamics of all indicators of exercise stress test significantly differ between groups, and if for the main group it is positive, in the control group it is negative. Some indicators of quality of life change insignificant and similar for both groups (for example, on the scale for limiting physical exertion), and on some scales (stability scales for attacks and the frequency of angina attacks), the improvement in the main group is much more significant in comparing with the control group: 3037 points versus 1213 points, respectively (p 0.0001). The overall quality of life assessment score improved more in the group, that use the ECP method: +96.1040.73 versus +45.3135.06 the control group (p 0.0001).
 Conclusion. The method of external counterpulsation (ECP) can be used in clinical practice as part of a comprehensive treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris; it can significantly reduce the class of angina pectoris and the need to use nitroglycerin preparations, improve a number of indicators of echocardiography, electrocardiography with exercise and quality of life indicators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKazan medical journalSame topicPain Management and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207