MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985258841 · doi:10.30973/esdi/2018.4.2/1

“Hasta que la dignidad se haga costumbre”: Performatividad, subalternidad y restauración en los casos de doña Jacinta, Teresa y Alberta

2018· article· es· W2985258841 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dónovan Adrián Hernández Castellanos

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudios del Discurso · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Health, and Social Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A partir de los casos de doña Jacinta Francisco Marcial, Teresa González y Alberta Alcántara, tres mujeres otomíes acusadas de secuestrar a seis agentes federales, se analizan los actos performativos por los cuales la Procuraduría General de la República se vio obligada en 2017 a implementar medidas de justicia restaurativa mediante una disculpa pública. Se indaga sobre las condiciones enunciativas y el complejo de visualidad implementado por el Estado mexicano, particularmente acerca de cómo refuerzan o cuestionan las posiciones subalternas de las mujeres indígenas. Finalmente, el ensayo reflexiona sobre las condiciones para avanzar hacia un Estado restituidor desde una perspectiva decolonial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudios del DiscursoSame topicGender, Health, and Social InequalityFrench-language works237,207