MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985287323 · doi:10.1002/gch2.201900065

Modeling and Forecasting of Energy Demands for Household Applications

2019· article· en· W2985287323 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Abdus Salam, M.G. Yazdani, Fushuan Wen, Quazi Mehbubar Rahman, Owais Ahmed Malik, Syeed Hasan

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Challenges · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoregressive integrated moving averageAutoregressive modelEnergy (signal processing)Energy consumptionArtificial neural networkSpline interpolationSolar energyInterpolation (computer graphics)Environmental scienceMoving averageEconometricsComputer scienceMeteorologyTime seriesStatisticsEngineeringMathematicsGeographyTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Energy use is on the rise due to an increase in the number of households and general consumptions. It is important to estimate and forecast the number of houses and the resultant energy consumptions to address the effective and efficient use of energy in future planning. In this paper, the number of houses in Brunei Darussalam is estimated by using Spline interpolation and forecasted by using two methods, namely an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model and nonlinear autoregressive (NAR) neural network. The NAR model is more accurate in forecasting the number of houses as compared to the ARIMA model. The energy required for water heating and other appliances is investigated and are found to be 21.74% and 78.26% of the total energy used, respectively. Through analysis, it is demonstrated that 9 m2 solar heater and 90 m2 of solar panel can meet these energy requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal ChallengesSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207